1. I believe the theme of this essay is open-mindedness. Throughout, Iyer exclaims his views on Maung-Maung as he first meets him and as they travel along together. Early on Iyer describes him as kind of someone that feeds off of tourists and takes advantage of them, later, he expresses his view on what he thinks Maung-Maung will do to him if he is able to take him into his house. But in a turn of events, we find out that Maung-Maung may just be one of the most interesting and deep characters that Iyer has ever met.
2. Iyer writes this piece using very casual language and descriptors. This ensures a first-read grasp of the story. I love the analogies that Iyer includes in the story such as on page 21 about his volleyball analogy. Iyer also uses good descriptions to make people realize his uneasiness and his level of discomfort such as on page 22 when he describes himself "as uncertain as an actor walking through a play he hasn't read."
I agree with you Alex. Maung-Maung represents the person in a culture or setting that breaks stereotypes and, in this case, turns out to be an amazing person. It makes sense that Iyer does not immediately trust Maung-Maung, because of the potential risks. But he is a wonderful person. I think this story serves as an example how, no matter the general actions and opinions of a people, individuals within that culture can be the most real people one will ever meet.
ReplyDelete